Data Protection Insider, Issue 42

– Commission Adopts Draft UK Adequacy Decisions

On 19th February, the European Commission published two draft adequacy decisions on the free flow of personal data from the EU to the UK. The first decision concerns transfers under the GDPR. The second decision concerns transfers under the LED. With the publication of the decisions, the Commission confirms that it believes the UK to offer an essentially equivalent standard of data protection to that offered in the EU. The publication begins the process for the final adoption of the decisions. This process “involves obtaining an opinion from the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the green light from a committee composed of representatives of the EU Member States.” Currently, transfers to the UK, without additional safeguards, are legitimated by an interim agreement under the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement. This interim agreement remains valid for four months from 1st January 2021 – with the option of extension by two months – or until the adoption of adequacy agreements. The publication of draft agreements should come as no surprise. There is undoubtedly considerable political pressure on the Commission to facilitate seamless personal data exchange with the UK. It is highly likely, however, that the eventual adoption of the draft agreements will face opposition moving forward. Sceptical opinions had already been issued as to the standard of UK data protection – in particular concerning the UK’s security and law enforcement frameworks– during post-Brexit negotiations. Even if the decisions are eventually adopted, there is still the possibility of intervention by the CJEU. The Court has already demonstrated its willingness to disagree with Commission evaluations of third-country data protection standards – see, for example, the recent Schrems II decision.

 

– Commission Adopts Draft UK Adequacy Decisions

On 19th February, the European Commission published two draft adequacy decisions on the free flow of personal data from the EU to the UK. The first decision concerns transfers under the GDPR. The second decision concerns transfers under the LED. With the publication of the decisions, the Commission confirms that it believes the UK to offer an essentially equivalent standard of data protection to that offered in the EU. The publication begins the process for the final adoption of the decisions. This process “involves obtaining an opinion from the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the green light from a committee composed of representatives of the EU Member States.” Currently, transfers to the UK, without additional safeguards, are legitimated by an interim agreement under the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement. This interim agreement remains valid for four months from 1st January 2021 – with the option of extension by two months – or until the adoption of adequacy agreements. The publication of draft agreements should come as no surprise. There is undoubtedly considerable political pressure on the Commission to facilitate seamless personal data exchange with the UK. It is highly likely, however, that the eventual adoption of the draft agreements will face opposition moving forward. Sceptical opinions had already been issued as to the standard of UK data protection – in particular concerning the UK’s security and law enforcement frameworks– during post-Brexit negotiations. Even if the decisions are eventually adopted, there is still the possibility of intervention by the CJEU. The Court has already demonstrated its willingness to disagree with Commission evaluations of third-country data protection standards – see, for example, the recent Schrems II decision.

 

About

DPI Editorial Team

Dara Hallinan, Editor: Legal academic working at FIZ Karlsruhe. His specific focus is on the interaction between law, new technologies – particularly ICT and biotech – and society. He studied law in the UK and Germany, completed a Master’s in Human Rights and Democracy in Italy and Estonia and wrote his PhD at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel on the better regulation of genetic privacy in biobanks and genomic research through data protection law. He is also programme director for the annual Computers, Privacy and Data Protection conference.

Diana Dimitrova, Editor: Researcher at FIZ Karlsruhe. Focus on privacy and data protection, especially on rights of data subjects in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Completed her PhD at the VUB on the topic of ‘Data Subject Rights: The rights of access and rectification in the AFSJ’. Previously, legal researcher at KU Leuven and trainee at EDPS. Holds LL.M. in European Law from Leiden University.

Leave a Reply